Copper-backed friction pads, manufactured in-house

How FTL helped SDTS replace an obsolete aircraft brake pad

SDTS needed to keep an aircraft operational after its original brake pad was no longer available on the market.

FTL worked with SDTS through the technical and commercial discussions, redesigned the pad using a material that met the stated aeronautical technical requirements, adapted the solution to SDTS's aeronautical environment and manufactured the replacement component.

The resulting work supported SDTS in certifying a modification applicable to its aircraft.

A named example of obsolete-component continuity progressing from an unavailable part to a manufactured and customer-certified replacement route.

The original brake pad was no longer available

SDTS's immediate problem was component obsolescence.

The aircraft still needed to operate, but the original brake pad could no longer be obtained from the market. A stock substitution or part-number purchase was therefore not sufficient.

SDTS needed a replacement route that addressed the specific aircraft application and could support its applicable modification-certification process.

Confirmed project requirements

Replace an unavailable aircraft brake pad

Support continued aircraft operation

Meet the stated aeronautical technical requirements

Adapt the component to SDTS's aeronautical environment

Produce a manufactured replacement of acceptable quality

Support a route that SDTS could certify for its aircraft

The replacement had to work within an aeronautical environment

Replacing an obsolete aircraft brake pad required more than reproducing its visible dimensions.

The proposed component needed to address the aircraft application, the stated aeronautical technical requirements and the evidence SDTS required for its modification route.

Component function

The replacement needed to perform the required aircraft braking function.

Detailed duty-cycle and performance values have not been approved for public disclosure.

Material route

FTL redesigned the pad using a material that SDTS states met the relevant aeronautical technical requirements.

The exact material family, formulation and public material reference have not been approved for public disclosure.

Application environment

The design had to be adapted to SDTS's aeronautical environment.

Modification and approval route

The component and supporting work needed to allow SDTS to complete the modification-certification process applicable to its aircraft.

The public customer account does not identify the certification authority or the detailed approval basis.

FTL connected the technical discussion, redesign and manufacture

The public customer account confirms six central elements of FTL's response.

Direct technical and commercial collaboration

SDTS worked with FTL through both the technical and commercial aspects of the requirement. This gave the customer one route through the component-development conversation rather than a disconnected series of suppliers.

Review of the obsolete brake-pad requirement

FTL engaged with the specific problem created by the unavailable original component. The project was treated as an engineering requirement rather than a catalogue search.

Redesign of the brake pad

FTL redesigned the component for the application. The customer describes it as a redesigned pad, not an exact reproduction or like-for-like copy.

Establishment of a replacement-material route

The redesigned pad used a material that SDTS states met the relevant aeronautical technical requirements. The formulation, material family and performance values have not been approved for public disclosure.

Adaptation to the customer's aeronautical environment

FTL adapted the replacement solution around SDTS's stated operating and programme context.

Manufacture of the replacement product

FTL manufactured the redesigned brake pad. SDTS described the quality of the manufactured product as “remarkable.”

From component obsolescence to a certified aircraft modification

01

Obsolescence created an operational risk

  • Original brake pad no longer available, aircraft still needed to operate
02

SDTS approached FTL for a replacement route

  • Began through direct technical and commercial discussions
03

FTL redesigned the brake pad

  • Redeveloped around the aircraft application and the information SDTS supplied
04

FTL established a suitable material route

  • Replacement pad used a material meeting the stated aeronautical technical requirements
05

FTL manufactured the replacement component

  • Redesigned product produced for the agreed customer route
06

SDTS completed its modification-certification process

  • FTL's responsiveness and adaptation to the aeronautical environment supported SDTS in certifying a modification applicable to its aircraft
07

The aircraft could continue operating

  • SDTS reports that the project allowed it to continue flying, landing and braking safely

What SDTS said about the project

To continue flying our aircraft, we approached FTL to find replacement solutions for our brake pad problem, as the original part was no longer available on the market. The quality of our discussions, from both a technical and commercial standpoint, FTL's responsiveness in redesigning the pad with a material that meets aeronautical technical requirements, and their ability to adapt to our aeronautical environment allowed us to certify a modification applicable to our aircraft. The quality of the manufactured product is remarkable. Thanks to FTL, we can continue to fly, land, and brake safely.

Olivier Moulin SDTS

Attribution

Customer

SDTS

Sector

Aerospace and defence

Aerospace fit

This project is part of FTL's aerospace friction support: obsolete-component continuity, redesign and manufacture for aircraft braking and motion-control applications.

Related capabilities

Reverse Engineering · Engineering & Design · Friction Material Formulation · CNC Machining · Bonding & Finishing · Testing & Inspection

Frequently asked questions about the SDTS aircraft brake-pad project

Why did SDTS contact FTL?
SDTS contacted FTL because the original aircraft brake pad was no longer available on the market and the organisation needed a replacement solution to continue operating its aircraft.
What did FTL provide?
The customer account confirms that FTL:
  • Participated in technical and commercial discussions
  • Redesigned the brake pad
  • Used a material meeting the stated aeronautical technical requirements
  • Adapted the solution to SDTS's aeronautical environment
  • Manufactured the replacement product
  • Supported the route through which SDTS certified a modification
Did FTL certify the aircraft modification?
No. SDTS states that it certified a modification applicable to its aircraft. FTL supported the component-development and manufacturing route described by the customer.
Which aircraft was involved?
The public information does not identify the aircraft type, model or registration.
Was the original drawing available?
That detail has not been publicly confirmed.
Which friction material was used?
The public testimonial states that the redesigned pad used a material meeting aeronautical technical requirements. The material family, formulation and reference have not been approved for public disclosure.
Was the replacement identical to the original pad?
The customer describes the component as a redesigned pad, not an exact, identical or like-for-like copy.
What testing or inspection did FTL complete?
The current public account does not identify the exact tests or inspection methods used.
Did the project lead to repeat production?
The current public information confirms that a replacement product was manufactured and used within SDTS's certified modification route. The repeat-production, inventory or call-off arrangement has not been publicly confirmed.
Can FTL guarantee the same result for another aircraft?
No. Every aircraft, component and modification route has its own:
  • Technical requirements
  • Operating conditions
  • Component information
  • Testing
  • Validation
  • Approval responsibilities
FTL can review the requirement and propose an appropriate engineering route.
Can FTL help when an obsolete component has no original drawing?
FTL supports legacy-component projects where the original drawing, material or supplier may no longer be available. The available component and application evidence must first be reviewed to determine what further engineering, testing and revalidation work is required.
Can FTL support the complete replacement component?
Yes, where the required route fits FTL's capabilities. FTL can connect material work with component engineering, machining, bonding, finishing, testing, inspection and repeat supply. The exact project scope must be agreed.
Does FTL support aerospace customers outside the UK?
Yes. FTL manufactures in North Wales and supplies components worldwide. 84% of output is exported.
What should we provide with an obsolete aircraft-component enquiry?
Useful starting information includes:
  • The application
  • Existing component
  • Available drawing or specification
  • Reason the original source is no longer available
  • Known operating conditions
  • Required technical behaviour
  • Applicable modification or approval context
A complete technical pack is not required before the first conversation.

Is an obsolete friction component putting aircraft continuity at risk?

Tell FTL what is no longer available, what the component needs to do and what technical information your team currently has.

A short initial brief is enough.

The relevant technical, engineering and commercial team members can then review the application, available evidence, replacement-material route and most appropriate next step.

Optional drawing or specification upload available. Do not upload classified, export-controlled or contract-restricted technical information through the public form.